Congress and this lean rating is assigned to a Wikipedia contribution that includes the same key phrase. Each phrase is assigned a slant index based on how often it is used by Democratic vs. This slant index purports to measure an ideological lean toward either Democratic or Republican based on key phrases within the text such as "war in Iraq", "civil rights", "trade deficit", "economic growth", "illegal immigration" and "border security". politics as of January 2011, measuring their degree of bias on a "slant index" based on a method developed by Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse Shapiro in 2010, to measure bias in newspaper media. In Is Wikipedia Biased? (2012), the authors examined a sample of 28,382 articles related to U.S. politics and the editors that work on them to identify aspects of ideological bias within its collective intelligence. Shane Greenstein and Feng Zhu of the Harvard Business School have authored several studies examining Wikipedia articles related to U.S. 2.3 Japanese Wikipedia and historical revisionismĪnalyses Bias in content in relation to U.S.2.2 Croatian Wikipedia and right-wing bias.1.2 Collaboration on contested or slanted content.1.1 Bias in content in relation to U.S.
Collectively, findings show that Wikipedia articles edited by large numbers of editors with opposing ideological views are at least as neutral as other similar sources, but articles with smaller edit volumes by fewer-or more ideologically homogeneous-contributors are more likely to reflect an editorial bias. Wikipedia has an internal policy which states that articles must be written from a neutral point of view, which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant points of view that have been verifiably published by reliable sources on a topic. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political, religious, or other ideology of its volunteer editors, and the effects this may have on the encyclopedia's reliability.
#WIKIPEDIA BITRASER FREE#
Real or perceived ideological bias on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, especially on its English-language edition, has been a frequent subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project.
It includes a wider area of usage like Healthcare, Telecom, Government, Automotive, Consultative, BFSI, Manufacturing, Recyclers & Refurbisher, ITAD, etc.Analysis of claims of ideological bias on Wikipedia Applications īitRaser can erase data from all the IT assets and prevent data leakage of sensitive data before recycling or disposal of the computer storage. Therefore, now it's become important to erase your data from hard drive with a secure method before reuse or dump.
#WIKIPEDIA BITRASER SOFTWARE#
Formatting and deletion are not at all enough to ensure the data privacy, as there are many data recovery software and services available, that claim to recover the data even after reformatting. North Atlantic Treaty Organization-NATO Standardĭata security should always be a priority for all the digital storage media users, even after disposing an old hard drive. US Department of Defense, DoD 5200.28-STD US Department of Defense, DoD 5200.22-M (ECE)
17 internationally recognized Algorithms It follows 17 international data wiping algorithms that allow corporations and government entities to permanently remove all the traces of information stored on their PC's, laptops, networked computers, servers, individual drives, etc. This tool meets the needs of Statutory Compliance and also provides comprehensive auditable reports and certificates.
#WIKIPEDIA BITRASER PORTABLE#
2 17 internationally recognized AlgorithmsīitRaser is a portable data destruction program that doesn't need installation and is capable of wiping IDE/ATA, SCSI, SAS, SATA hard drive, USB, and SSDs.
0 kommentar(er)
